英属哥伦比亚大学UBC – 学术诚信准则

学术诚信申诉 - 英属哥伦比亚大学UBC
英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)是全球教学、学习和研究中心,一直位居世界公立大学前 20 名。
UBC 拥抱创新并将想法转化为行动。自 1915 年以来,UBC 一直为那些充满好奇心、干劲和远见的人们打开机会之门,以塑造更美好的世界。
The University of British Columbia is a global centre for teaching, learning and research, consistently ranked among the top 20 public universities in the world.
UBC embraces innovation and transforms ideas into action. Since 1915, UBC has been opening doors of opportunity for people with curiosity, drive and vision to shape a better world.
 
学术诚信对于英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)作为高等教育和研究机构的持续运作至关重要。UBC项目的所有申请者都有责任确保他们提交给 UBC 的所有申请材料真实完整,并且所有UBC学生都应成为学术界诚实和负责任的成员。违反这些期望或未能遵守有关学术诚信的适用政策、法规、规则或指南,构成学术不端行为,并可能产生严重后果。
Academic integrity is essential to the continued functioning of UBC as an institution of higher learning and research. All applicants to UBC programs are responsible for ensuring that all application materials they submit to UBC are true and complete and all UBC students are expected to behave as honest and responsible members of an academic community. Breaching those expectations or failing to follow the applicable policies, regulations, rules, or guidelines with respect to academic integrity constitutes academic misconduct and may have serious consequences.
学术诚信申诉 - 英属哥伦比亚大学UBC

1. 英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)如何约束学术/非学术行为?

使用诚信计划(“诚信计划”)是学术不端行为事件转移的一种形式。转移程序仅适用于已承认的不当行为的情况,即学生之前没有学术不端行为记录,并且院长确定诚信计划将是解决已承认的不当行为的适当机制。为促进该分流工具在全校有序实施,将按学院分阶段逐步实施。有关实施的信息可以从教务长兼学术副校长办公室获得。
The use of integrity plans (“Integrity Plans”) is a form of diversion for incidents of academic misconduct. The diversionary process is only available in cases of admitted misconduct, where the student does not have a previous academic misconduct record, and where the Dean determines that an Integrity Plan would be an appropriate mechanism to address the admitted misconduct. In order to facilitate the orderly implementation of this diversionary tool across the University, it will be implemented progressively on a Faculty-by-Faculty basis. Information regarding implementation can be found obtained from the Office of the Provost and Vice-President.
 
如果院长认为诚信计划是解决已承认的不当行为的适当机制,并且学生同意,则院长和学生可以就诚信计划达成一致。院长和学生都没有义务就诚信计划达成一致;使用诚信计划之前需要征得双方同意。如果任何一方不同意诚信计划,则院长可以选择向学生发出书面警告或将此事提交给校长委员会。任何未经院长和学生最终同意的诚信计划草案的内容不得由任何一方向校长委员会提出,也不会得到校长的考虑。
If a Dean determines that an Integrity Plan would be an appropriate mechanism to address the admitted misconduct, and if the student is in agreement, the Dean and the student may agree upon an Integrity Plan. Neither the Dean nor the student are obligated to agree upon an Integrity Plan; the agreement of both parties is required before an Integrity Plan will be used. If either party does not agree to an Integrity Plan, then the Dean will have the option to either give the student a written warning or to refer the matter to the President’s Committee. The content of any draft Integrity Plan that was not ultimately agreed to by both the Dean and the student may not be raised by either party before the President’s Committee and will not be considered by the President.

2. 英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)如何判定学术不端问题?

1. 提交虚假或不完整的记录或信息(submitting false or incomplete records or information)
submitting false or incomplete records or information to UBC, or failing to provide relevant information when requested, and which includes application misconduct
向UBC提交虚假或不完整的记录或信息,或在被要求提供相关信息时未能提供
 
2. 作弊(Cheating)
cheating, which includes, but is not limited to:
i. falsification of any material subject to academic assessment, including research data;
ii. use of or participation in unauthorized collaborative work;
iii. use in an examination of any materials or devices not specifically permitted by the instructor or examiner; and
iv. use or facilitation of unauthorized means to complete an examination or coursework (including, but not limited to, receiving unauthorized assistance from another person (as one example only, retaining or paying a tutor or another person to do your work), or providing that assistance, or accessing websites or other online resources not specifically permitted by the instructor or examiner);
伪造任何受学术评估的材料,包括研究数据;
使用或参与未经授权的合作工作;
在考试中使用任何未经教师或考官特别允许的材料或设备;
使用或促成使用未经授权的手段完成考试或课程作业;
接受未经授权的帮助,或提供该帮助,或访问未经教师或考官特别允许的网站或其他在线资源;
 
3. 考试携带违规物品(possession not permitted during the exam)
possession during an examination of any materials or devices not specifically permitted by the instructor or examiner.
在考试期间携带任何未经教师或考官特别允许的材料或设备
 
4. 剽窃(Plagiarism)
namely submitting or presenting the work of another person as one’s own, without appropriate referencing. (Scholarship quite properly rests upon examining and referring to the thoughts and writings of others. However, when another person’s words (i.e. phrases, sentences, or paragraphs), ideas, or entire works are used, the author must be acknowledged in the text, in footnotes, in endnotes, or in another accepted form of academic citation. Where direct quotations are made, they must be clearly delineated (for example, within quotation marks or separately indented).
即提交或呈现他人的作品为自己的作品,而没有适当的引用。(学术研究应恰当地建立在审视和参考他人的思想和著作之上。然而,当使用他人的文字、观点或整个作品时,必须在正文、脚注、尾注或其他公认的学术引用形式中对作者进行致谢。如果直接引用,必须清楚地标明引用。未能提供适当的归属是抄袭,因为它将他人的作品表示为自己的作品。抄袭不应出现在提交的草稿或最终作品中。寻求家教或其他学习辅助工具帮助的学生必须确保该作品是学生自己的。学生有责任确保提交的任何作品不构成抄袭。对于什么构成抄袭有任何疑问的学生应在交作业前咨询他们的教师。)
 
5. 自我抄袭(self-plagiarism)
committing self-plagiarism (reuse of one’s own previous work, whether in whole or in part, or the same or substantially the same work, without appropriate referencing and without prior approval from the instructor(s) to whom the work is to be submitted)
犯下自我抄袭,重复使用自己以前的作品,无论是全部还是部分,或相同或实质上相同的作品,而没有适当的引用和未经提交该作品所需教师(们)事先批准
 
6. 冒充(impersonating)
impersonating a student, facilitating the impersonation of a student, or allowing another person to impersonate them during an examination or any other academic assessment
在考试或任何其他学术评估期间冒充一名学生、促成冒充一名学生、或允许另一个人冒充他们
 
7. 因学术不端行为而施加的任何纪律措施(any disciplinary measure imposed for academic misconduct)
failing to comply with any disciplinary measure imposed for academic misconduct
不遵守因学术不端行为而施加的任何纪律措施

3. 英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)如何申诉?

学生有权向根据《大学法》第 37(1)(v) 条设立的参议院委员会(学术纪律学生上诉参议院委员会)上诉校长的任何纪律处分决定。
A student has the right to appeal any disciplinary decision of the President to the Senate Committee (the Senate Committee on Student Appeals on Academic Discipline) as established under section 37(1)(v) of the University Act.
 
提出上诉的学生必须以书面形式通知教务长,并充分解释上诉的理由。教务长必须在校长致函学生告知学生纪律处分决定之日起 45 个日历日内收到此通知。如果书记官长认为情况有必要,可以延长此期限。
A student who wishes to appeal a decision of the President under paragraph 11.1 must so notify the Registrar in writing and give a full explanation of the grounds for the appeal. The Registrar must receive this notification within 45 calendar days of the date of the President’s letter to the student informing the student of the disciplinary decision. The Registrar may extend this time limit if, in the Registrar’s opinion, circumstances warrant.
 
上诉由至少 5 名参议院委员会成员审议,除非学生同意更少的成员。学生和发起人可以向参议院委员会提交书面意见,供上诉时考虑。学生可以由任何人代表或协助上诉,包括法律顾问。大学法律顾问可以指定法律顾问协助发起人完成上诉程序。
Appeals are considered by at least 5 members of the Senate Committee, unless the student consents to fewer members. The student and the Initiator may make written submissions to the Senate Committee for consideration at the appeal. The student may be represented or assisted at the appeal by any person, including legal counsel. The University Counsel may designate legal counsel to assist the Initiator through the appeal process.

英属哥伦比亚大学对于申诉的流程有详细的官方指南,更多详细信息请查看:英属哥伦比亚大学(UBC)

4. 为什么选择象牙塔国际教育?

象牙塔作为国际教育咨询行业的领先者,深耕教育行业数十年,致力于制定服务于人生目标的教育规划。自成立以来,成功帮助数千位学生积极面对危机并走出困境。

象牙塔针对各个阶段都有着数十位经验丰富的团队顾问,在学术危机中,团队老师谨记学生案件的难点、痛点、以及紧迫性,站在学生的立场上制定极具前瞻性的解决方案,尽全力做到走对每一步,避免后续链式负面影响的发生。

我们深知学生承担着多大的压力,我们也愿意站出来为学生分担风险。在学生遭遇到学术诚信问题时,都需要经历纷繁复杂的过程,象牙塔国际教育致力于打造全链条、立体化、一站式的学术诚信危机处理服务平台,我们希望能做同学们学术道路上的坚固防线,为你们的学习生涯保驾护航。

快速导读

微信扫码
联系我们

本文详解渥太华大学博士项目,包含项目介绍、适合人群、CPT政策、申请要求、申请流程等,助你合法留美。
本文详解路易斯大学(NLU)DBA博士项目,包含项目介绍、项目优势、适合人群、CPT政策、申请要求、申请流程等,助你合法留美。
Day-1 CPT转H-1B需要注意什么?本文详解H-1B 10月1日生效后的COS流程、CPT是否还能使用、Day-1 CPT学校如何处理、材料保留、RFE应对措施。
9月14日法院裁定暂缓D/S新规实施。本文梳理F-1新规最新进展及后续时间线,并分析F-1、OPT/STEM OPT、二硕、Day-1 CPT、EOS和Grace Period等变化,帮助不同身份阶段的留学生规划下一步。